Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 Definition of Evidence There was no general evidence available regarding the abduction of the complainant's son. The arrest and recovery of the accused violated Section 103, no identifiable complaint regarding payment of CRP. The complainant version was not the ransom money did not inspire confidence, nor the payment of the ransom amount was neither reliable nor the amount recovered was the amount of the ransom paid by the complainant. The identity test was of no identity value and did not support the retrograde confession. The plaintiff's complainant had improved his FIR during the trial but was alleged that despite his wishes, he was not examined on oath in violation of the prerequisites of section 34040. , The CR PC has no expert opinion available to show that the tape contained the voice of any accused who spoke to the complainant over the telephone. jobs for fresh advocates from Chaininda lawyer