Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 Definition of Evidence There was no general evidence available regarding the abduction of the complainant's son. The arrest and recovery of the accused violated Section 103, no identifiable complaint regarding payment of CRP. The complainant version was not the ransom money did not inspire confidence, nor the payment of the ransom amount was neither reliable nor the amount recovered was the amount of the ransom paid by the complainant. The identity test was of no identity value and did not support the retrograde confession. The plaintiff's complainant had improved his FIR during the trial but was alleged that despite his wishes, he was not examined on oath in violation of the prerequisites of section 34040. , The CR PC has no expert opinion available to show that the tape contained the voice of any accused who spoke to the complainant over the telephone.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Faisalabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.