MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus THE STATE
The Explosives Act 1908 Section 5 was charged with possessing three grenades. The only witnesses to recover the hand grenades from the possession of the suspects were two advisers, and one police inspector, Mashish, was not inspected while the stock of the other policeman and a competent witness was proved. Despite the oath, such a conscience could not encourage such a conscience after the evidence that the conscience was rejected, the evidence of the police inspector, cannot be believed that the evidence of a ballistic expert who had Had allegedly investigated the hand grenades recovered from the accused, but had also become irrelevant under the circumstances alleging hand grenade recovery, without giving any doubt, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. Was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Chowk Azam lawyer