GULAB versus MALKANI
The Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII of the CPC Review OXLVII, R1 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), petitioner regarding the delay of review of the Section 5 decision, claimed that when his appeal was dismissed, he did not Neither his lawyer was present in the court nor his lawyer who had informed him of the fate of his appeal. Such facts were not denied by the respondents in filing the affidavit in which the appeal was dismissed. Claims were made regarding the date of the application, after accepting the application for registration of the petition, the court delayed filing the application. Delayed expression
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Multan lawyer
