Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Para 18 (3) Allotment of land resumed to tenants, including applicants and respondents, by the Chief Land Commissioner in such a jurisdiction has become final because anyone It did not challenge the challenge that such parties, the applicants, had accepted. The allotment in favor of the respondents and the respondents under Land Reform Regulation 1972, on Monday 18 (3), proved that the applicants and the respondents were not cultivating the land in question, in proving that through the applicant's documentary evidence. Failing that they were occupied. Even the land applicants could not prove it. Their claim to be land-based was better than that of the respondents. Acquisition of the rights of the parties cannot be disturbed even after allotment of land for many years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
