Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA MUGHAL versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Appointment of two additional High Court Judges by the President of Azad Jammu and Kashmir without the advice of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council and the advice of the Chief Justice of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The retention writ and the High Court declared the High Court unconstitutional, however, because of the bar contained in Article 44 (5) of the Constitution, the writ of quart warrant was refused, the High Court Judge 7 Appointment of Additional Judge was open to challenge the petition for a writ petition by the High Court to challenge the writ petition, the High Court judges No writ petition can be issued against anybody, constitutional application against the appointment of additional judges of the High Court will not be accepted. In this regard, the appointment of the respondents as additional judges will not apply to the law, they were held at such public offices without the authority of the law. lawer from fb area from Utror lawyer