Defendants of the provisions of Sections 5 and 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Conduct Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974 did not find the defendant guilty of self-defense. The presence of eyewitnesses at the time of the incident was natural, probable and even acknowledged. The evidence of the medical evidence and the site planning prosecution, along with unbiased and unwanted evidence, have been confirmed, therefore, cannot be excluded only because of the relationship between the parties, the ratio of interest or tension, and the charges are sentenced. ? Depending on the nature of the injured witness's injury, however, the amount of fire was reduced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
