Find a Lawyer

GHULAM FATIMA versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN

Section 4 and 14 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Enforcement Shariat Act, 1989 and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Parade Purchase Act, 1893 (BK), Section 14 (B), the applicant's application is before the trial court, in this section, section 14. (B) For the first time and secondly, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Preferred Purchase Act is being declared as Sharif's Shariah. Such a question is referred to the High Court; the trial court decided to interfere with the High Court. Denied that the Full Bench of the High Court had already decided in the Shariah context that first and secondly the provisions of section 14 (b), AJK and the imposition of Kashmir. The Shariat High Court of the AUT Act 1989 was denied! But Hate was unable to explain any date in the case after which such a clause would affect the failure of the High Court. To set the target's date, the High Court's decision was limited to just one educational exercise that had no practical effect. The government also did not manage to repeal the relevant provisions, Section 14 (b) of the Ordinance and Second, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Enforcement Sharia Act 1989, thus, it was the High Court to continue to become the law of the land, so it There was no justification for quoting in this regard. The provisions were set aside under the orders of the High Courts under reference and the trial court was instructed to accept the petition moved by the petitioners and send the reference to the High Court, which was capable of deciding. solicitors from Hattian lawyer