The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, was charged with suppressing the 13 Activities of Terrorism (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975); defining section 7 evidence that contained unlicensed Kalashnikovs and possessing 20 live cartridges. Yes, one of the three recovery witnesses was the Inspector Police, who was naturally interested in convicting the accused, the second witness to the public did not support the prosecution's case and the third could be declared safe. As the stock witness prosecution failed to prove his case beyond the reasonable trial charges, he was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
