Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB.


The reference to the jurisdiction of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18 Reference Court could not be withdrawn from the reference and the jurisdiction could not be obtained to determine it, especially with regard to such questions only. The reference is referred to the court, therefore, there was no jurisdiction to determine the limitation question. This type of work was within the collector's domain that sent the reference. Reference Court funding that a request for reference filed by one of the owners' claimants was withheld from time to time without complete jurisdiction and the finding was not sustained that such an employer did not file a claimant appeal. Was done and to no avail, such owner had filed cross-objections; according to law it could be dealt with. The court had sufficient authority to give relief to the party who had not filed an appeal. Nor did he cross any objection.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Bahawalpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.