Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus THE STATE

Article 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Suppressing Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (1975, XV of 1975), holding unlicensed Kalashnikovs / Stangshan Kalashnikovs under the jurisdiction of Section 7 of the Special Courts, G. Rifle or any other He was prosecuted for possessing a rifle. Schedule for suppressing terrorist activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Pakistan Arms (Amendment) Ordinance (XVI of 1988), Suppressing Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) (Amendment) Ordinance (1988) XVII), and pressures on terrorist activities (Special Courts) (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XXV of 1988) Ordinance No. XVII of 1988 and Ordinance No. XXV of 1988 within four months of their release before the appellate legislators Was not kept, and as such, stands. The pressure of terrorist activities was automatically abolished (Special Courts) (Amendment) Ordinance (I of 1990) re-enforcing the Schedule Position in the Act as amended by T he Ordinance Ordinance (1990). I) was not banned from being placed before the appropriate legislative assembly within four months and the continuation of the ordinance could not be sustained. The Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) (Amendment) Act (V of 1990) was finally enacted. ? The amendment submitted under Ordinance No. I of 1990 was retained. On the dates of Kalashnikov's / Stingan's recovery from the accused, neither Ordinance No. XVI, XVII or XXV was alive, nor is the trial under trial for the charges against the accused under those ordinances. Regarding having an unlicensed arm, the ordinance was declared a jumer jodes offense and the sentence was set aside and the tr jobs for fresh advocates from Ghazi lawyer