Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) of the Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, v. 1x2, R1 and 2, was passed by a single judge of the High Court on the question of granting a temporary injunction and After turning his mind to the facts, it was claimed that the plaintiff / applicant had filed a preliminary case and that the balance of convenience was more in favor of the plaintiff that the sole judge of the High Court was at his discretion. Not expressly or implicitly used, cannot be justified in interfering with the discretion used by it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
