Find a Lawyer

BILQUIS FATIMA versus NASIM AHSAN

Civil Code 1908 Section 115 of the Code of Conduct, dismissed a request filed by the defendants before the defendants to resume their duties and to close their position as an application for a retrial. At the 1986 trial, he was unaware of the proceedings and on the knowledge that the judgment was passed against him, it came to the court record that the defendants were first dismissed in 1985, while their lawyers. Died in 1986, however, the trial court's two lawyers are linked to the diary that the lawyer appointed later on two occasions While one of the defendants was present on the occasion after his first amendment, the defendant, once personally and twice, appeared before the court, for which the lawyer gladly moved his request. There was no plausible explanation that the defendants did not intend. The date disclosed when they learned of passing the judgment against them was a case of failure to exercise jurisdiction by the trial court or No material misconduct was identified by it which resulted in non-service of service or court notices. The question was not before. Get up, the defendants and their appropriate advisor counsel are excluded from the situation without substance before appearing before the court. top civil advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer