Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABID HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD MAZHAR


Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (j), 15 and 19 (5) of the landlord and the tenant were rejected by the applicants and the tenant controller after recording the evidence, dismissing the request for settlement. There was no relationship between the landlord and the tenant. The decision of the rent-controlling parties shows that neither of the concepts laid down under Section 19 (5) of the Ordinance has been stated nor the matter mentioned in the decision. The decision was not made to show that the rental controller had obtained the results when the decision was approved. On some issues, but no matter what the issues were or the points for the determination, it was not stated that the rent controller's ordinance did not comply with the provisions of section 19 (5), it could not be sustained. Is.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.