ABID HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD MAZHAR
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (j), 15 and 19 (5) of the landlord and the tenant were rejected by the applicants and the tenant controller after recording the evidence, dismissing the request for settlement. There was no relationship between the landlord and the tenant. The decision of the rent-controlling parties shows that neither of the concepts laid down under Section 19 (5) of the Ordinance has been stated nor the matter mentioned in the decision. The decision was not made to show that the rental controller had obtained the results when the decision was approved. On some issues, but no matter what the issues were or the points for the determination, it was not stated that the rent controller's ordinance did not comply with the provisions of section 19 (5), it could not be sustained. Is.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Taxila lawyer
