The Supreme Court Appellant against the tenant executing Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15, 21 and 23, objected to the eviction order passed against the tenant by the tenant controller, who had four of the pending tenants. Was one of the children. The eviction proceedings, which lasted for about six to six years between the landlord and the tenant, were filed in this connection and sought to be included as a party to the execution. The petition filed by the appellant was dismissed on the basis that it remained silent for almost six years during the withdrawal process. In the Supreme Court, could not join the execution. Appellant's request to join the execution proceedings was rightly dismissed because the appellant did not have the right to order as a party to the execution proceedings or to order dismissal under execution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
