The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13, without a charge of appreciating the evidence, was recovered at Kalashnikov's identification of the suspect behind the police station in his shop, which was specifically occupied by the accused police officers as the prosecution's witnesses testified. Was successfully subjected to scrutiny by the police authorities as a good witness public, no material contradiction, major contradiction or dishonest improvement was identified by the accused. The defendant failed to refute the prosecution's case and the evidence presented by him and the documents presented by the defendant in his defense, did not prove the prosecution's case wrong or adversely affected it. The credibility of the restoration witnesses was alleged in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1992
