The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 was accused of defining Section 13 evidence for possessing unlicensed Kalashnikovs and firing bullets to prove that the alleged possession of the suspects not only yielded felony weapons, but also Even though he didn't have a valid license. The prosecution's witnesses did not state anywhere that the suspect did not have a license to export the weapons. In the absence of evidence that the accused did not have a license, the prosecution failed to prove a conviction under Section 13 of the Ordinance, it was not possible for the accused to maintain the conviction and sentence of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
