Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

UMAR DARAZ SHAH versus DIRECTOR, L.D.A.


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Responding Authority Petitioner sought to withdraw from petitioner's dismissal, sought to withdraw, qualified for constitutional resolution, in a dispute arising out of contentious fact, The civil suit was an effective alternative and not every citizen could dispute. Will be taken up by the High Court for extraordinary jurisdiction to do so, by doing so, bypassing the common law remedy available in the appropriate legal forum established by the law applicant but failing to indicate What were the compelling reasons for the dispute. Its decision in the High Court's extraordinary jurisdiction and why it was not necessary for its competitor to seek appropriate relief to appropriate relief in an inappropriate jurisdiction to meet the relief required to file a case in civil court. Rejected and applicant dismissed. In LA for its general legal treatment

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Mingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.