GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus SYED IMAM ALI SHAH
In section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and in the Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 restitution was attended by the Family Court on the evidence presented by the parties and valid for the evidence and unbelief of the wife. And there were strong reasons. The husband was presented by the petitioner, although he sought Res Judesta, but still could not find a copy of the record of the order passed in the previous case to recover the Family Court restitution allowance. There was no decision on merit before, no matter the request. The court will bring the principle of the judiciary, the courts did not violate any provision of the law; the appellate court had consciously exercised the points that came before the High Court under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. It would not be appropriate to interfere with the court's interpretation of the evidence below.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Lahore lawyer