Sections 3 (2) (3), 10, 22, 45 and 55 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan, 199 Constitution Petition Claims to Restore Judicial Separation and Minority Rules in Rehabilitation Disputes An alternative method of civil revision for the determination of disputes in the faith was that the applicant (wife )'s contention was that judicial separation could be granted on the basis of cruelty, including mental and physical torture, and evidence presented by the husband. Also The basis for the respondent's (husband's) acquisition of judicial separation was that the forum for proceedings under section 3 (2) and (3) as well as section 45 of the Divorce Act, 1869 was civil court and civil. The procedure of this court, regulated by the Code of Procedure, 1908, therefore, after dismissing the appeal from the district court, the applicant had an alternative to civil amendment rather than benefit from a constitutional jury included in the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The rejection of the provisions of the High Court Jurisdiction did not have much effect on the Divorce Act, 1869, because the former was a provincial law, called the Central Constitution. The Act, 1869, could not abolish the clear supply of the West. The Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 was a useful legislative case under which the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, provided for speedy remedies over Western disputes, subject to this condition on the illegal marriage of spouses belonging to the Christian faith. Under which they are claiming. Their assistance was not in conflict with the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 and on the same lines where there was a specific provision in the Divorce Act, 1869, it contradicted the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Courts.
