MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 218, 468 and 161 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the evidence was not mentioned in the FIR for the accused to accept bribe by the accused, the amount of bribe from the accused. Not received and raiding operation not taken. Evidence of litigation against him was neither free nor affected by trust No direct evidence was available on record by the accused to the forgery commission, no one had the accused remove the address of the measles kidney register or vice. The office statement was not seen to be replaced. Lawongo, who was not a handwriting expert and in whose presence the documents were not produced, did not matter. The prosecution, thus, failed to prove its case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt, the accused. Was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Chak 46 lawyer