KITABISTAN LTD. IN THE MATTER OF. versus KITABISTAN LTD. IN THE MATTER OF.
The original procedure was dismissed by the Civil Procedure Code Order XLI, X 31 of the appeals of the CPC, which, by default, the application for restitution of the case was dismissed by default, but the appellate court Ordered restoration of the appellate court before ordering restitution of the case, admitted record and evidence discussing the order also does not cite evidence from witnesses examined by the parties, separating the order of the appellate court , X 31, RC, was not properly adjudicated, the order of the appellate court was set aside and the RAM for fresh judgment in this case The egg was obtained. In accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer
