GHULAM DASTAGIR versus JUMMA
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 & 54 A case has been established for the claimants of permanent injunction by presenting documents and oral evidence that in return for their claim the defendants were allotted land in dispute before the so-called allotment. ? Since the land allotment was in his favor, and that he was never a tenant under the plaintiffs' courts, it resulted in the misreading of not only the documents presented on the record. , But also the statement of the witness which was itself a derivative factor. The following court orders passed against the plaintiffs were set aside and sued to declare them and the permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff was ordered with costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Mangla lawyer