MAHBOOB AHMAD KHAN versus PUNJAB PROVINCE
Removal from the Service (Request for Review) Regulation (MLR 116) Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules; Forced Retirement of Seniority Appellant under MLR 114 under Notification Dated 12 8 1973 of the Establishment Division, 1973 Order was discharged under MLR 116 ??? Order recovery and retrieval results of services ?? Appellant was not allowed to restore services received from him during interruption after fixing his sanity. Even so, as he had prayed for the appellant regarding the retirement of his retirement order, he was believed to have retired from that position. El was deposed as though he had not retired from the job and has since become. All benefits of continuity in service, including promotion and allowance, are entitled, with the direction of the appellant's appeal, that the matter be reconsidered for professional promotion as well as from the date of development of the next junior. Until that time, they should also be paid cash.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Sara e Naurang lawyer
