MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE
The defendant, accused of reviewing S 302 Evidence Act (Constitution of 1872), sections 6, 7 and 8, tried to make a false defense of his conduct after the incident, namely, he was crying and in the name of the offender. Was taking the name of another person, which might have led them to safely assume that the suspect was thought to be the same, as well as his other actions immediately after the incident, evidence, Under section 6, 7 and 8 of the Act 1872, the most relevant factors may be noted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer
