Section 17 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 was the default landlord and tenant, the appellant's relationship in the interest of a woman who, in addition to the decree of exclusive ownership in her favor, was also the daughter and heir of the original landlord and Was through operation. By law, a landlord and respondent of the suit property was the only tenant under the relationship of the landlord and the tenant, therefore, was established between the appellant and the defendant, and no independent evidence from the appellant Was not required to prove that the defendant was invited. As a tenant because the defendant was occupying the suit house on his own shoot since his father was liable under the original owner, in such circumstances the appellant's request was liable for eviction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
