Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes
Or unlock 10 direct numbers for Rs 1,000

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ HASHIM


Section 100 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) allowed the appeal to consider the question whether the High Court should not have interfered with the concurrent finding of fact in the second appeal when it had evidence and material It was only after being brought. Keeping the ratio in the case of Mir Abdullah v. Mohammed All and others 1977 SCMR 280 and Shamshad Ali Shah and others v. Hassan Shah and others PLD 1964 SC 143.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Mir Ali lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Explore

Platform

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Terms Privacy Policy Refund Policy Delivery Policy Made in Pakistan 🇵🇰
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.