Find a Lawyer

C.I.R., ZONE-VI, R.T.O., LAHORE versus SANAWAR HUSSAIN

The decision in sections 129, 122 (1) (5) and 111 (1) (b) will be remanded by the appellate authority before the appellate authority for the reviewing officer's case. Taxpayers are being heard and the reviewing authority was remanded for de novo proceedings, as considered under the law, for proper evaluation, by the taxpayer examining officer in his case. The taxpayer had sufficient resources to invest in the purchase of motor vehicles in order to confirm that the taxpayer had the taxpayer's certification before the appellate authority. Better options were put in place to review. Every effort should be made to include the taxpayers in the proceedings and the matter should be decided accordingly. Taxpayers were also advised to cooperate with the department in their interest.

Related judgments — Inland, 2014

• FAROOQ ALTAF v. C.I.R., R.T.O., SIALKOT 2014 PTD 1383
• 2014 PTD 1400 2014 PTD 1400
• C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI v. KARACHI PORT TRUST, KARACHI 2014 PTD 1428
• DILPASAND TEXTILE MILLS, FAISALABAD v. C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD 2014 PTD 1467
• NAMCO ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE v. C.I.R. ZONE-VII, R.T.O-II, LAHORE 2014 PTD 1492
• LION STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE v. C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE 2014 PTD 1509
• 2014 PTD 1542 2014 PTD 1542
• FAISALABAD ELECTRIC COMPANY v. C.I.R, ZONE-I, R.T.O., FAISALABAD 2014 PTD 1629

All Inland judgments of 2014 →

list of advocates from Miran Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes