Failure to pay Taxes Sections 161, 205 and 153, ignoring all the details and records presented by the taxpayer under section 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 or the taxpayer, Was taxed from without having to identify his name and address. The first appellate authority to be cut was dismissed or invalidated by a mistreatment officer, but eventually withdrew a lawsuit after passing a spelling order. Without identifying the names and addresses of the parties or individuals and where the tax is to be deducted, the provisions of Section 161 cannot be enforced by the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where the taxpayer has provided all the data / records / documents along with supporting documents. Data / records were presented, provided the Assigning Officer was in the frame of intelligence and could not appreciate that the tax would be deducted. Section 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 required that certain identified taxpayer / person be a taxpayer. Only after proving that he was a holding agent, not subject to such taxation, was he personally liable. The officer responsible for examining the details and documentary evidence responsible for such a tax for his own small reasons was denied and rejected. If the assessee officer deliberately misunderstood section 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, he can only see whether the tax on the return, return and legal statements escaped the imposition of section 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Be charged with avoiding the deduction
