SIDDIQ versus CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, KARACHI
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 According to the personal requirement of the landlord, it has been claimed that the premises once used for commercial use cannot be altered for its use because of a residential approved building. The plan indicates that the premises was made residential, in addition to the stores located on the right. To the left of the entrance, the residue in it was a manifestation of its basic residential character. The main role of the premises of the premises is that its temporary use for non-residential purposes will not violate its original and substantive role. The environment and infrastructure around it will not be considered difficult to meet the personal needs of its owner primarily because the residential complex was identified so there is no natural barrier to its use. Therefore, the landlord is entitled to exercise his right to use the cover for his personal purpose for a residential purpose.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Shahdad Pur lawyer
