Find a Lawyer

MOHAMMAD NASIM BUTT versus MAHMOODUL HASSAN

Section 24 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963, the appellant / tenant, who was sued by the rent controller against the former party, claimed that he had an order to remove the former part of the rent controller against him. There is no information about, so they were deported in compliance with this order. The limitation for filing an appeal against the order of withdrawal should be calculated from the date of knowledge of this order and not from the date of the approval of this order, but the date that the bull's tenant was correct in the date of the order's approval. Notwithstanding the imposition of section 5 of the Imprisonment Act, 1908. Under the Cantonment Rent Regression Act, 1963, if an order is approved without notice to the affected person, such limitation shall operate from the date of knowledge and not the date of the order, the appropriate service to the appellant / tenant, established Not because of Appellant's appeal information for filing an appeal against a rent control order will be run out of date. criminal advocate from Kech lawyer