GHULAM MOHIUDDIN versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) of the Bank Staff Service Rules of Wage Commission Award to act as a service dismissal officer on recommendation. Plaintiffs were liable for dismissal, late deposit of bank receivables from customers, over draft and loss of a prize bond which he declared guilty of good appellant in domestic inquiry and dismissed. Was dismissed, Labor Court also dismissed appellant's complaint request, inquiry report withheld The Appellant was not examined before the Inquiry Officer appellant was denied his right to have the opportunity to cross-examine under such section O 15 (4). The complainant confessed before the inquiry officer that his complaint against the appellant was not in his own writing but it was written / by some officer of the bank inquiry proceedings initiated against the appellant under the Bank Staff Rules. The reinforcements were also held illegally, there was no evidence before the inquiry officer that the allegations against the appellant were substantiated; It may be raised that this amount was in fact ordered by the appellant worker without any benefit, To be restored to Damascus
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Sahiwal lawyer
