ABDUL AZIZ ADMANI versus MAPRA & SONS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (7) The transfer applicant claimed that the Presiding Officer, the Labor Court, had been discriminated against and called in his chamber to move his case. In two other cases, the trial court itself had granted a petition and the cases were moved from its court while in the present case it did not make such a request because the applicant has been summoned because the applicant. The Labor Court did not accept the request for testimony and to produce the document. The reason cannot be considered as a valid reason for accepting the transfer request The transfer request was rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer
