Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMAD versus SINDH LABOUR COURT NO. VII,.SUKKUR

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O10B and Section 7 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 7, Section 202, West Complaint under Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968) The preliminary investigation procedure will be considered only to consider whether the first case has come up or where the employer has to investigate the complainant. Was allowed to do the proper procedure was not taken, the complaining worker filed a complaint under section 7 of the Ordinance Ordinance on non-insuring of the respondents / employer under which the case under Section O 10B Labor Court Had already been filed under section 202 of the CCPC and the complaint was dismissed. On the basis that the Standing Order did not apply to the ordinance establishment, the Labor Court allowed the complainant to examine the appropriate procedure for CH in Section 202, CCPC, was not considered: Complainant / The applicant had submitted a document before the Labor Court that, through the Establishment, he had been issued a permanent employment department ticket, indicating that it was issued under Section O2. Standing Order Ordinance, 1960 Such document itself was the primary evidence that the Standing Order Ordinance applied to the Labor Court's Establishment Order, which dismissed the applicant's complaint and separated it in that direction. A summons should be issued against him and a complaint be prosecuted. Labor Court as a Regular Case when you need a advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer