RISHAD CHOUDRI versus CANTONMENT BOARD, KARACHI THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Sections 77, 99 (2) (b) and 259 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 The application of the Constitution is being used for charitable activities. Provision of property tax and conservation tax on property granted to the Cantonment Board from 1 7 1987 30 6 2004 Return to the Board of Cantonment 23 11 2003 On the basis of such waiver and audit objections raised by the Department Accounts Committee, the petitioner's trust demands to file such tax. The Validity Trust property was being used to support FDMR and other charitable activities, while the hall was rented. There was nothing available on record to the parties organizing the program in order to show that the applicant's trust was earning reasonable income from his property, therefore, section 99 (2) (b) of the Cantonment Act, 1924 ) Was not entitled to a waiver, will be exempt once. The widespread and liberal construction exemption on tax exemption was raised after 14 years, after which he considered the applicant a charitable trust, and tax exemption could be considered as a waiver of years of exemption. Had acquired its right in such waiver and would have been entitled to it if the claim for tax already exempted by the Cantonment Board could not be claimed, otherwise it would also include a previous, closed and complete transaction. The re-opening of the Right to Affect Legislation did not take effect in the Cantonment Act, 1924; Wright declared the unidentified demand illegal and had no legal effect.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
