Find a Lawyer

SHAKEEL AHMED versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND RENT CONTROLLER

Section 2 (g), Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the tenant's removal (applicant) The personal need of the landlord, the way he liked it and did not record any ineligible or negative indications by the rent controller. , Nor can it be construed as an excuse to refuse the request for personal necessity, provided for by section 15 of the Sindh Rented Primes Ordinance 1979. There are not enough security arrangements for the benefit of the tenants in the rented outlets but the tenants did not have to decide what the landlord needed, which was the landlord's absolute choice and the constitutional application was dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• JUNAID GHAFOOR v. State 2014 YLR 2672
• ALI GHULAM v. State 2014 YLR 2685
• Mst. JAMILA v. State 2014 YLR 2703
• ASIM RIZWANI v. State 2014 YLR 2714
• DUR MUHAMMAD alias HANEY v. State 2014 YLR 2735
• YAWAR FARUQUI v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LTD. 2014 CLD 1
• RISHAD CHOUDRI v. CANTONMENT BOARD, KARACHI through Chief Executive 2014 PLD 1
• MUHAMMAD IKRAM v. PRINCIPAL AND CHAIRMAN ADMISSION COMMITTEE, SUKKUR 2014 MLD 1

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

jobs for advocates from Noor kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes