MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS
The provisions of Articles 2 (a) (f) and 3 of the Ordinance 1959 banning the rent of a West Pakistan citizen claimed that there was no building or property of the tenant in the dispute, but this is an industrial concern. Because it was not attracted to such provisions of Ordinance VI of 1959. The tenant of the matter stated in a written statement that he had obtained the property in dispute to operate the factory, but did not request that the factory was already present when the rent was leased to his premises between the parties. The contract also shows that the premises were leased to the tenant at the same time that the cover was an industrial concern and that the provisions of the Ordinance 1959 did not apply to the matter, however, withdrew it. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Thatta lawyer
