AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus NEELUM FLOUR MILLS
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Section 42 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (h) Constitutional jurisdiction, there is no law to comply with the contract required to pay handling charges provided for the payment of handling charges. But only the agreement between the parties to pay for it, the question between the parties; therefore, section 44, regarding the implementation of the contractual obligations of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, clearly indicated That the jurisdiction granted by this section was applicable only where the applicant was before the High Court. Based its complaint on a violation of the law. The decision, which was based on a breach of contract, was largely excluded under which the High Court exercised its jurisdiction to enforce the contractual obligation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer