Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMAD versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 5 (3) (a) and the 15 Punjab Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1975, RR 4, 6 and 7 terminated the employment of a public servant, who was appointed against the temporary post. He was terminated while he was still on probation, without issuing a showcase notice and without any investigation, because he had failed to satisfactorily complete his trial period, a job approved by the authorities. The dismissal order was also declared a misdemeanor against a civil servant because he was accused of not being on duty. Since the public servant was clearly accused of misconduct, it could only be regarded as a scandalous one and since such public servants were entitled to protection of Section 15 of the Act, 1974, they were entitled to a show cause notice. Was. Ion 15 of the Act 1974 on the grounds of termination of services of civil servants without proper inquiry under the Rules of 1975 without proper notice and without proper inquiry against the public servant. best law firms from Leepa lawyer