Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ OADIR versus DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT, PUNJAB

After the initial investigation found misconduct, Employee 4's corruption appellant was put under suspension, removed from the charge sheet and the job, and the reason for noting the explanation for the notice was not satisfactory, His order of dismissal was challenged by the appellant, it was dealt with and decided in accordance with the law / provisions of Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1973, the appellant was denied any authentic oral or documentary evidence. The source failed to deny the allegations against them. He was so serious and serious in accusing the appellant of lying or misconduct that he deserved the dismissal of the job. Appellant also failed to prove that he was in any way motivated during the proceedings. We were treated unfairly or there was no such case. Law of Intervention by Service Tribunals best advocate from Jhang lawyer