DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR versus MUHAMMAD SHAMSHAD
Disobeying the Articles 25A (8) and 38 (3A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the retention of the workman filed a complaint against the employees for violating the Labor Court's alleged orders and the court Issuing a notice to the employer of such complaint issued an order to the employer, clearly showing that the court had not yet admitted the employees' complaint, but it was only issued to the employer so that Give him the opportunity to present his case, but the employer was not obliged to appear in court on that notice. The Labor Court has not yet admitted to bringing a regular record of the case and the case, the review filed by the employer against such order was premature when the Labor Court decided to bring the matter to the forefront. Will you have the freedom to file a job update request in this case? Record, and issue an official summons or warrant against it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer
