MAZHAR ALI versus THE STATE
Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 5 Appreciating Evidence Defendant's request was considered admissible, but no respected person in the area was declared a prosecution witness, although his presence was acknowledged by the prosecution. Who had examined himself was not according to the witnesses. , Swabs sent to Chemical Examiner in numerous material matters cannot be said with certainty that a police officer related to this case was presented as the last witness to complete the transcript of four Muslim adult witnesses, although his name There was no mention of anywhere in the ground that Tazkiyah al-Shudh was made by the trial court from any witnesses as the prosecution's case under Medical Evidence under section 7 of the Ordinance was not supported because of the time of the incident and the story of the prosecution. Was unusual. The witnesses of the police witnesses had poles in their evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Layyah lawyer