MST. MUSARAT BIBI versus THE STATE
Adultery of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Testimony of Evidence There were material contradictions in the ocular testimony on important aspects of the case; many people appeared as confessions at the time of the incident, but none of them Was not examined by the prosecution. The investigating officer was required to confirm the version listed in the FIR, especially when the head constable of the police station had a special charge that was a star witness in this case, after deliberation and consultation, and the investigation If not done honestly, the charges were dismissed on benefits. Doubt in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Pasni lawyer
