NAZAR KARIM versus THE STATE
A Penal Code (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), Section 6 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 of the Tribunal of the Pakistan Penal Code section 409/34 and section 5 Was based on On speculation and allegations and he changed the charges to allegations that he paid against proven / approved bills and took legal action to prove every component and detail of the crime. The accused cannot be transferred to prove the duty and such burden. His innocent prosecution failed to produce the required documentary evidence and prove on file that the accused could even be convicted, even from the District Accounts Office where the bank was accused of making unauthorized payments. Has not been claimed to be involved in any kind of money fraud or fraud. The investigating agencies were made to ascertain whether anyone had suffered any loss, thus failing to prosecute the prosecution with all charges. Was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Narang Mandi lawyer
