NASIR ALI versus MUHAMMAD ALI
0 III, R 1, OXXXIII, R1 and Section 115 Sindh Chief Court Rules (OS), R 85 suit in pharma pauperis, dismissed for illegal prosecution The plaintiff's wife filed a petition for restitution on the basis of which Excluded that they do not have Lux Standby. While filing a petition for the rehabilitation of the applicants' spouse for rehabilitation, it is claimed that the plaintiff is her husband's lawyer, yet according to R 85, she cannot present a power of attorney at any stage, Sindh The record of the Chief Court rules shows that no power of attorney was presented, thus the trial court justified dismissing the application for rehabilitation, as it was filed by an unauthorized person.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Sihala lawyer
