MUHAMMAD YASIN versus STATE
Appealing the value of evidence in Pakistan Panel Code Section 4, Part I, the trial court convicted the accused for murder under Section 304 (1), PPC, concluding that there was no enmity between the parties. And is the result of a recurrence of the incident. The victim's father joked with the father and the accused, who was a young boy, could not tolerate his father's infamy and, under provocation, the deceased suffered a single knife blow, which proved that the deadly suspect was his Did not challenge the sentence, but prayed for it because of the lack of punishment because he was a little boy, he suddenly provoked his father by defaming him and was accused of imprisoning him for seven years. He was sentenced and ended his sentence for more than five years. In the convicted case, the accused is deemed to be relaxed and, while maintaining his conviction, his prison term has been reduced to an NT that has already passed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Gujranwala lawyer