Pakistan Panel Code Section 377 praised the evidence Victim, who was under the age of six at the time of the commission of the crime, was subjected to a lengthy crossing, but the defense could not bring anything on record which shows that It would be unsafe to rely on. None of the prosecution's witnesses, who provided an ocular account for the incident, did not advise the accused doctor of any motions or wrongdoing against the medical examiner's doctor, he testified. Given the positive impression that the victim had been subjected to misconduct, the prosecutor was able to fully prove his case. It is suspected that the trial court did not find any wrongdoing or reading evidence that the accused was sentenced, but in view of the fact that the accused was 16 years of age at the time of the conviction. Was less, ten whipping was punished. The trial court acquitted the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
