Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASEER versus SOHAIL ALIAS DITTU

Revised evidence against the Pakistan Penal Code Section 7/7/2 452 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 18 Sec94), Articles 35 by35 and itt 439 by appellate court has been appreciated, the house of the complainant and the injured witnesses. Happened, so they were natural witnesses. From the fact that witnesses were injured, their presence at the time of the incident was very strong. The accused was previously known to the witnesses and thus there is no difficulty in identifying him. Three people were injured by the acid and only one of the accused was involved with the witnesses. There was no basis for substitution of the accused in the place of the original culprit and the number of the injured and the number of the culprit was acquitted by the appellate court on the basis of allegations, speculations and on the basis that they were on record and aliens of evidence. In the circumstances in this case, the arrest of the accused on the basis of the allegations that did not support the evidence and the circumstances presented in the case, was indeed a serious miscarriage of justice which was heard by the High Court. best law firm from Jehlum lawyer