Sections 302 (b) and 324 Qutel-e-Adh, the attempt to interpret the evidence, the benefit of the doubt The benefit of the suspect was recorded the very next day, the statement of the prosecutor's witness, whose sole testimony was sentenced by the trial court. The statement of the incident was contrary to his statement under Section 161 on Friday, accusing the CRPC of making general allegations such as the indiscriminate firing of the deceased and injured persons, whose eyes were The witness was not examined and no plausible explanation was given, for which medical evidence shows that the injuries to the prosecutor's witness were due to the firearm, but no bullet to the body. No evidence was found, or no blank or weapon was found by the accused trial court. The principle that every person is considered innocent until proven guilty unless re-evaluated by the sole testimony of the injured, without any co-operation, from the facts provided to the NT record is false, inaccurate or non-existent. A point of view can be drawn as to the reasonable conclusions, because the material evidence was misread to the extent that the victims of justice abortion were left behind and the complainant accused the accused of the crime. Did not For the same reason and the ground participant was acquitted by the trial court, no motive was taken by the trial court for serious wrongdoing while the accused was sentenced to more than half the sentence after being sentenced, the prosecution's witness Generating skeptical doubts in the mind, not enough to record the conviction was not enough to produce a conviction in the present case.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
