Find a Lawyer

UNITED COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. versus ZAFARULLAH KHAN

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), ONI, R17 and Sections 105 and 115 allowed the court to legally amend the plaintiff The plaintiff requested amendment to the plaintiff in this case That they have paid another six lakh rupees. (6,00,000) By adjusting the Balance Sale Price, the Plaintiff Defendant submitted a photocopy of the amended receipt stating that he had received only sixty thousand (60,000) and the final receipt A payment of Rs 5 lakh appears in the line and forty thousand (40,000, 000,000) on the same occasion thereafter to examine the insights in the trial court and even to compare the receipts of the two dates. Otherwise, otherwise the dispute on the same but specified additional payment line should be paid by the plaintiff on the advice of the plaintiff for payment of Rs. To determine who was the author of the receipt, and whether the strange facts of the oral case and the decree passed by the trial court, allowed the trial court to allow the plaintiff a partial modification. As a result, the books in the account were not answered. Under the question, for the exercise of the discretionary jurisdiction of the court, the applicant had a remedy for committing legality in Section 105, Civil Procedure Code 1908, and the final decree passed in this case, An amendment to his ownership was excluded in his appeal. Conditions criminal advocate from Darya Khan lawyer