Sections 323, 452 and 148/149 of the Criminal Procedure Code (VCR 189), 5 439 the appellate court, after acquitting the accused, applied their conscious mind to the relevant evidence and There were concrete and definite reasons for concluding. The appellate court was able to admit or deny the evidence on record. The appellate court declared the witnesses not reliable enough to suppress the wounds of the accused, the motive was not proved, the evidence of the inquiry officer was not properly acknowledged by the trial court, one of the accused allegedly took the hatchet No sharp injuries were found on the injured witnesses. There were reasons for not relying solely on the statements of witnesses who were assisted by the evidence on record and the circumstances of the case were appreciated according to the law. Legal intervention efused in the circumstances of a reasonable decision to be acquitted of the amended jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
